存档

文章标签 ‘ARM’

树莓派1和树莓派2的性能对比(5):Real World PHP & MySQL BenchMark

2015年3月22日 没有评论

系列文章:

树莓派1和树莓派2的性能对比(1):Synthetic PHP BenchMark

树莓派1和树莓派2的性能对比(2):Synthetic MySQL BenchMark

树莓派1和树莓派2的性能对比(3):Synthetic Read Write BenchMark

树莓派1和树莓派2的性能对比(4):Real World PHP BenchMark

上次树莓派1和Cubieboard对比的地址为:

树莓派和Cubieboard对比测试(6) – Real World PHP & MySQL BenchMark

Pi Pi2
PHP version 5.6.6
MySQL version 5.5.5-10.0.17-MariaDB-log
Server Software Apache/2.4.12 (Unix) PHP/5.6.6
Real World PHP & MySQL BenchMark
test_page1a 2.3365 seconds 0.7525 seconds
test_page1b 2.3499 seconds 0.7534 seconds
test_page1c 2.3339 seconds 0.7531 seconds
test_page1d 2.3447 seconds 0.7529 seconds
test_page1e 2.3353 seconds 0.7529 seconds
test_page2a 6.4310 seconds 1.8929 seconds
test_page2b 6.3900 seconds 1.8923 seconds
test_page2c 6.4243 seconds 1.8913 seconds
test_page2d 6.4153 seconds 1.8927 seconds
test_page2e 6.4204 seconds 1.8924 seconds
test_page3a 9.0395 seconds 2.6444 seconds
test_page3b 9.3039 seconds 2.6462 seconds
test_page3c 8.9621 seconds 2.6440 seconds
test_page3d 8.9731 seconds 2.6467 seconds
test_page3e 8.9627 seconds 2.6429 seconds
test_page4a 12.5272 seconds 3.7309 seconds
test_page4b 12.3040 seconds 3.7344 seconds
test_page4c 12.7825 seconds 3.7329 seconds
test_page4d 12.3229 seconds 3.7370 seconds
test_page4e 12.4328 seconds 3.7291 seconds
Score(higher is better) 198 665

树莓派1和树莓派2的性能对比(4):Real World PHP BenchMark

2015年3月22日 没有评论

系列文章:

树莓派1和树莓派2的性能对比(1):Synthetic PHP BenchMark

树莓派1和树莓派2的性能对比(2):Synthetic MySQL BenchMark

树莓派1和树莓派2的性能对比(3):Synthetic Read Write BenchMark

上次树莓派1和Cubieboard对比的地址为:

树莓派和Cubieboard对比测试(5) – Real World PHP BenchMark

Pi Pi2
PHP version 5.6.6
MySQL version 5.5.5-10.0.17-MariaDB-log
Server Software Apache/2.4.12 (Unix) PHP/5.6.6
Real World PHP BenchMark
test_1_small_page 1.1907 seconds 0.5099 seconds
test_1b_small_page 1.1620 seconds 0.3424 seconds
test_1c_small_page 1.1608 seconds 0.3422 seconds
test_1d_small_page 1.1648 seconds 0.3435 seconds
test_1e_small_page 1.1701 seconds 0.3411 seconds
test_2_medium_page 3.2147 seconds 1.0279 seconds
test_2b_medium_page 3.2330 seconds 1.0329 seconds
test_2c_medium_page 3.3178 seconds 1.0358 seconds
test_2d_medium_page 3.3654 seconds 1.0369 seconds
test_2e_medium_page 3.3518 seconds 1.0372 seconds
test_3_large_page 9.9856 seconds 3.1942 seconds
test_3b_large_page 10.2158 seconds 3.1947 seconds
test_3c_large_page 9.9806 seconds 3.1957 seconds
test_3d_large_page 10.2136 seconds 3.1958 seconds
test_3e_large_page 10.2217 seconds 3.1928 seconds
test_4_huge_page 15.8610 seconds 4.9444 seconds
test_4b_huge_page 15.5103 seconds 4.9461 seconds
test_4c_huge_page 15.8390 seconds 4.9671 seconds
test_4d_huge_page 15.6031 seconds 4.9714 seconds
test_4e_huge_page 15.6240 seconds 4.9754 seconds
Score(higher is better) 297 941

树莓派1和树莓派2的性能对比(3):Synthetic Read Write BenchMark

2015年3月22日 没有评论

系列文章:

树莓派1和树莓派2的性能对比(1):Synthetic PHP BenchMark

树莓派1和树莓派2的性能对比(2):Synthetic MySQL BenchMark

上次树莓派1和Cubieboard对比的地址为:

树莓派和Cubieboard对比测试(4) – Synthetic Read/Write BenchMark

Pi Pi2
PHP version 5.6.6
MySQL version 5.5.5-10.0.17-MariaDB-log
Server Software Apache/2.4.12 (Unix) PHP/5.6.6
Synthetic Read Write BenchMark
test_1_create_dir 0.0014 seconds 0.0010 seconds
test_2_create_tempfile 0.0015 seconds 0.0009 seconds
test_3_write 0.2340 seconds 0.1246 seconds
test_4_append 0.1555 seconds 0.0863 seconds
test_4b_append 0.1521 seconds 0.0840 seconds
test_5_fileinfo 0.4854 seconds 0.2825 seconds
test_6_read_1024 4.3047 seconds 1.2699 seconds
test_6b_read_512 4.4377 seconds 1.1854 seconds
test_6c_read_256 6.0634 seconds 1.7323 seconds
test_6d_read_128 9.6558 seconds 2.6062 seconds
test_6e_read_64 14.4697 seconds 4.5069 seconds
test_6f_read_32 24.8038 seconds 7.7512 seconds
test_6g_read_16 52.2430 seconds 15.5660 seconds
test_7_read_8 74.0824 seconds 21.8323 seconds
test_9_readdir 2.4713 seconds 1.0116 seconds
test_del_file 0.0014 seconds 0.0008 seconds
test_del_tempdir 0.0010 seconds 0.0004 seconds
Score(higher is better) 124 413

树莓派1和树莓派2的性能对比(2):Synthetic MySQL BenchMark

2015年3月22日 没有评论

系列文章:

树莓派1和树莓派2的性能对比(1):Synthetic PHP BenchMark

上次树莓派1和Cubieboard对比的地址为:

树莓派和Cubieboard对比测试(3) – Synthetic MySQL BenchMark

Pi Pi2
PHP version 5.6.6
MySQL version 5.5.5-10.0.17-MariaDB-log
Server Software Apache/2.4.12 (Unix) PHP/5.6.6
Synthetic MySQL BenchMark
test_db_setup 1.3504 seconds 0.4811 seconds
test_distinctcolumn 6.0972 seconds 2.0539 seconds
test_fetcharray 3.4702 seconds 1.0954 seconds
test_fetchassoc 3.1557 seconds 1.0263 seconds
test_fetchlength 3.1741 seconds 1.0148 seconds
test_fetchrow 3.1540 seconds 1.2152 seconds
test_fieldflags 13.0071 seconds 3.5117 seconds
test_maxget 2.8478 seconds 0.8929 seconds
test_numfields 8.9720 seconds 2.2549 seconds
test_numrows 10.1692 seconds 2.2571 seconds
test_rowcount 1.0088 seconds 0.2399 seconds
test_sort 15.3296 seconds 4.1467 seconds
test_sort2 16.1388 seconds 4.1016 seconds
test_sort3 15.2947 seconds 4.1456 seconds
test_sumcolumn 2.8440 seconds 0.9381 seconds
test_write 1.3475 seconds 0.3367 seconds
test_write2 1.3922 seconds 0.3848 seconds
test_write3 1.4473 seconds 0.3876 seconds
test_write_cleanup 0.0107 seconds 0.0044 seconds
Score(higher is better) 145 524

今天用终端连上了ARM9的开发板,发图纪念

2010年5月10日 没有评论

我的本子没有COM口,买了一个支持开发板的USB的COM口,接上转换线,然后打开电源。Win7里面没有XP时代的HyperTerminal,找了一个开源的PuTTY,设置好串口速率,等窗口出现光标以后,敲个回车就出下面的画面了。image

大家不要笑话我这都记下来,我还是嵌入式的初哥。手册里面只有XP下用HyperTeminal怎么用,没有说Win7 x64下面怎么办,都是在摸索。其实现在还是不解决所有问题,下面还要研究image怎么刷到机器上面。

其实找一个开发板玩是我一直以来的想法,当初在94年的时候,高中的计算机课老师就在学校里面搞嵌入开发板控制的自动寻路的小车,当时我就想等我以后挣钱了要自己搞一个玩。现在做一个那样的小车还不现实,但是我有了一个开发板。记得那时候老师的开发板是摩托罗拉芯片的,应该是16位的。现在我的开发板是32位ARM的了,可以跑Linux和WinCE。FreeBSD也有ARM的Port,研究一下应该也可以在上面跑起来。

分类: ARM 标签: